In a nationalized healthcare system, you need to know who’s who – otherwise the system could never find a way determine who’s entitled. The structure depends on what the system is established and designed, but with a nationalized healthcare system you will undoubtedly be tracked by their state where you reside and the method that you move in a fashion that is unseen in America. The nationalized healthcare system becomes a vehicle for population control.
In the event that you leave the United States and are no more a resident of their state, even if you are a resident and might maintain a driving license, you will need to report immediately if you intend to avoid the 13% healthcare tax. I personally use the quantity 13% because it is in Sweden to exemplify the particular tax pressure that is laid upon you for the nationalized health care.
Let’s say you moved and you may not want to pay the 13% tax for services you may not receive, can receive, or wish to taken right out of the tax roll. The mammoth entity doesn’t have interest to enable you to go so easy. You will end up being forced to reveal your private life – partner, dwellings, travel, money, and job to prove your case that you’ve the best to leave the general public healthcare system and do not need to pay the tax. When you have to seek an appeal, your information might be a part of administrative court documents which can be open and public documents. The moment you go back to the United States, you will undoubtedly be automatically enrolled again and the taxes begin to pile up.
Public universal healthcare doesn’t have curiosity about protecting your privacy. They desire their tax money and, to fight for the rights, you will need to prove that you meet the requirements to not be taxable. In that process, your private life is up for display.
The national ID-card and national population registry which includes your medical information is a basis of the nationalized healthcare system. You can see where this is going – population control and power to use the law and healthcare access to map all of your private life in public areas searchable databases owned and operated by the government.
By operating an impeccable population registry that tracks where you reside, who you reside with, when you move and your citizen status including residency the Swedes can separate who is able to receive universal healthcare from those not entitled. The Swedish authorities will know if you have a Swedish social security number, with the tap of the keyboard, more information about yourself than you can remember. The Swedish government has taken sharing of information between agencies to a brand new level. The reason why is very simple – to collect healthcare tax and suppress any tax evasion.
It is heavily centralized and only the central administration can alter the registered information in the data. So if you intend to change your name, even the slightest change, you’ve to file a software at a national agency that processes your paperwork. This centralized population registry makes it possible to find out who’s who under all circumstances and it’s required for the national healthcare system. Otherwise, any person could claim to be entitled.
To implement that in the United States takes a brand-new doctrine for population registry and control. Within an American context that will require that each existing driving license must be voided and reapplied under stricter identification rules that will match not merely data from Internal Revenue Service, state government, municipal government, Social Security Administration, and Department of Homeland Security but almost any agency that provides services to the general public. treatment and management of asthma The reason why a brand new population registry could be needed in the United States is the fact that lax rules dating back to the 1940s up before the War on Terrorism, and stricter identification criteria following 9/11, has made an important percentage of personal details about individuals questionable.
If America instead neglects maintaining secure records, determining eligibility for public healthcare would not be possible and the floodgates for fraud would open and rampant misuse of the system would prevail. This would eventually bring down the system.
It is financially impossible to create a universal healthcare system without clearly knowing who’s entitled and not. The machine needs limits of its entitlement. A social security number would not be adequate as these numbers have already been given out through decades to temporary residents which may not even reside in the United States or might today be out of status as illegal immigrants.
The Congress has investigated the cost of lots of the “public options”, but nevertheless we’ve no clear picture of the particular realm of the group that could be entitled and under which conditions. The danger is political. It is very easy for political reasons to extend the entitlement. Politicians would have trouble being firm on illegal immigrants’ entitlement, as that will put the politicians on a collision course with mainly the Hispanic community because they represent an important part of the illegal immigrants. Therefore the easy sell is then that everyone that is a legal resident alien or citizen can join according to at least one fee plan and then a illegal immigrants can join according to another fee structure. That assumes that they actually pay the fee which is a wild guess because they are probably be able to get access to service and never having to state that they’re illegal immigrants.
It would work politically – but again – with no impeccable population registry and control over who’s who on a national level, this is unlikely to succeed. The machine could be predestined to fail as a result of lack of funds. In the event that you design a system to offer the healthcare needs for a population and then increase that population without any additional funds – then naturally it would result in a lowered level of service, declined quality, and waiting lists for complex procedures. In real terms, American healthcare goes from being a first world system to a third world system.
Thousands, if not just a million, American residents live as every other American citizen but they are still not in good standing with their immigration even if they have been here for ten or fifteen years. A universal healthcare system will raise issues about who’s entitled and who’s not.
The choice is for an American universal healthcare system to surrender to the fact that there’s no order in the people registry and just provide healthcare for all who shows up. If that is completed, costs will dramatically increase at some level according to who’ll get the bill – their state government, the government, or the general public healthcare system.
Illegal immigrants which have arrived within the past years and constitute an important population would create a massive pressure on a common healthcare, if implemented, in states like Texas and California. If they’re given universal healthcare, it would have been a pure loss for the system because they mostly work for cash. They will never be payees to the universal healthcare system because it is based on salary taxes, and they do not file taxes.
The difference is that Sweden has almost no illegal immigrants compared to the United States. The Swedes do not provide healthcare services for illegal immigrants and the illegal immigrants can be arrested and deported if they might need public service without good legal standing.
This firm and uniform standpoint towards illegal immigration is essential in order to avoid a common healthcare system from crumbling down and to steadfastly keep up a sustainable ratio between those who pay into the system and those who benefit from it.
The working middle income that would be the backbone to pay into the system would not only face that their existing healthcare is halved in its service value – but most likely face higher cost of healthcare because they will be the ones to pick up the bill.
The universal healthcare system would have maybe 60 million to 70 million “free riders” if centered on wage taxes, and maybe half if centered on fees, that’ll not pay anything to the system. We know that approximately 60 million Americans pay no taxes as adults add to that the estimated 10-15 million illegal immigrants.
There’s no way that a universal healthcare system can be viably implemented unless America creates a population registry that may identify the entitlements for every individual and that will have to be designed from scratch to a high degree as we can not count on driver’s license data as the product quality could be too low – too many errors.
Many illegal immigrants have both social security numbers and driver’s licenses as we were holding issued without rigorous control of status before 9/11. The choice is that you had to show a US passport or perhaps a valid foreign passport with a natural card to be able to register.
Another problematic task is the amount of points of registration. If the registration is completed by hospitals – and not just a federal agency – then it’s highly likely that registration fraud could be rampant. It could be very easy to trespass the control of eligibility when it is registered and determined by a hospital clerk. This supports that the eligibility must be determined by a central administration that has a vast access to data and details about our lives, income, and medical history. If one single registration at a health care provider or hospital would guarantee you free healthcare forever and there’s no rigorous and audited process – then it’s a given that corruption, bribery, and fraud could be synonymous with the system.
This calls for an important level of political strength to confront and set the limits for who’s entitled – and here comes the actual problem – selling out healthcare to have the votes of the free riders. It is apparent that the political power of the “free” healthcare promise is very high.
A promise that may not alienate anyone as a stronger population registry would upset the Hispanic population, as lots of the illegal immigrants are Hispanics – and many Hispanics could be citizens by birth but their elderly parents are not. Would the voting power of younger Hispanics act to put pressure to extend healthcare to elderly that aren’t citizens? Yes, naturally, as every group tries to maximize a unique self-interest.
The danger is, even with an enhanced population registry, that the group of entitled would expand and put additional burden on the system beyond what it was designed for. That can come though political wheeling and dealing, sheer inability from an administrative standpoint to spot groups, or systematic fraud within the system itself.