Hair is this kind of emotive subject and with human nature being human nature, what we want we can’t have and what we’ve we don’t want! Wild hair and we want straight, straight hair and we want curly, brunette and we want blonde, blonde and we want red. Likewise upper lip hair on women, so valued as an indicator of exquisite beauty using elements of the planet, is vilified by our Western society.
Unwanted hair is a common problem affecting most women to varying degrees throughout their lives and prompting the usage of various temporary types of hair reduction or hair management systems. It causes great distress, and it is often combined with feelings of poor self-confidence, an expression of isolation and low self worth.
Because the occasions when bearded women in Victorian travelling fairs were displayed for entertainment and ridicule, Western society has nurtured a stigma about excess hair. Many women are pressured into tremendous lengths to remove any trace of hair from any and every part of these body as they feel it to be unattractive and unappealing. However it is not just women which are now affected… increasingly the male gender is subject to pressure from the ‘fashion’ and celebrity world and unwanted hair may be in the same way vilified by the male population nowadays as the female.
Different Ways of Hair Removal
Superfluous hair growth may be due to many factors, such as for example, hormone imbalance, (during puberty, pregnancy and menopause), genetics and ethnicity, hereditary, medication or topical stimulation e.g. waxing or tweezing. Therefore, electrolysis – the only real permanent way of hair removal, is a treatment that is in great demand by female and transsexual clients and now, due to society’s attitudes, the amount of male clients is increasing.
To meet up this need there as been many hair removal measures some of which go back centuries in history. Hair removal has existed since caveman times but interestingly the elements of the human body we’re removing hair from have differed within the ages. Removing hair from the top and face of men was originally not for vanity purposes but for survival. There is evidence that cavemen did this but also the ancient Egyptians and it was undertaken, we imagine, for protection, as scraping off the beard and hair on the top would take away the benefit of an adversary having anything to grab onto along with having less mites!
In ancient Egypt, Greece, and Middle Eastern countries, removing body hair was important. Actually these women removed most of these body hair, aside from eyebrows. Egyptian women removed their head hair and pubic hair was considered uncivilized by both sexes! It absolutely was also considered uncivilized for men to have hair on the face. Undesired facial hair was the mark of a slave or servant, or of a person of lower class. The ancient Egyptians used a questionnaire of razors manufactured from flint or bronze as the razor wasn’t invented till the 1760’s by French barber, Jean Jacques Perret.
In addition they used a way of temporary hair removal called sugaring. A sticky paste (bees wax was sometimes used) could be placed on skin, a strip of cloth was pressed onto the wax and yanked off – the equivalent of waxing today. Wealthy women of the Roman Empire would remove their body hair with pumice stones, razors, tweezing and pastes. There is also another technique used called threading which is recently seeing a resurgence in popularity. Thin string or yarn could be placed through the fingers of your hands, and quickly stroked within the area. This repetitive process captured the hair and effectively tweezed, ripped or pulled the unwanted hair out. During the Elizabethan times the practice of hair removal, (not of leg, armpit or pubic hair), of these eyebrows and the hair from their foreheads in order to give the looks of a lengthier brow and forehead was fashionable. It’s startling to note well-known influence ‘fashion’ has played in hair removal from ab muscles beginning.
Waxing, sugaring, depilatory creams, bleaching, shaving, sugaring, plucking, threading and even battery-powered tweezers multiple-plucking systems, are all temporary methods that numerous people try today. Actually new hair removal devices seem to appear like buses – every 20 minutes roughly! However, technology has shifted and with it, it appears there are some restricted and doubtful types of hair removal. X-ray and photodynamic methods are in a restricted category since the former has been banned in some countries just like the USA and the latter are just in experimental stages. 激光脫毛 Electric tweezers, transdermal electrolysis, and microwaves are a number of the doubtful methods in that there surely is no established data on the effectiveness.
Electrolysis remains the only real proven permanent way of hair removal and many women and indeed many men, have benefited from this tried and trusted treatment. It’s often the case that electrologists are privileged to witness a remarkable transformation in their clients, from a timid, introverted personality in the beginning of a course of treatments, to a confident and happy individual once treatment is underway and results become apparent.
Whatever your opinion of hair, ‘removing it’ inside our Western society is a multiple million pound industry. Such a huge money making machine though could have more than its great amount of misconceptions, misunderstandings, myths and legends none of which relate much to the hard reality truth. The huge profit led hair removal industry has its great amount of charlatans and scams all attracted by the huge profit led opportunities.
Hair Removal methods are both permanent and temporary. The English dictionary definition of ‘permanent’ states: perpetual, everlasting. With this particular at heart there’s only 1 system in the marketplace today that could totally prove ‘permanent’ hair removal primarily because longevity, client testimony and satisfaction and that is electrolysis. Invented in 1875 electrolysis offers permanent removal of hair for all hair types and colours and all skin types and colours. It continues to be utilised in hospitals by surgeons and ophthalmologists for trichaisis and other distortions of the eyelashes as well supporting a medical facility laser hair removal departments. It can also be considered an important tool in the work of veterinary surgeons for animals (primarily horses and dogs) for the permanent removal of distorted and in-growing eyelashes. It provides cosmetic relief for the customer with mild hirsute problems to the patient with seriously hirsute problems and for the transgender patient who may require much time of treatment.
Apparently there’s been confusing messages coming from the regulatory bodies on definitions of what the language ‘permanent’, ‘removal’ or ‘reduction’ in the hair removal industry actually mean. Agreement was reached that if the hairs which were removed don’t grow back for an amount of one year after the last treatment, permanent reduction may be claimed. Electrolysis, invented in 1875 remains even today, the main one method legally allowed to claim ‘permanent removal’ ;.
The newer technologies such as for example LASER (Light Amplification Stimulated Emission of Radiation) and IPL (Intense Pulse Light) were initially launched as competitors of electrolysis and initially marketed as THE answer for all permanent hair removal. This, it is now realised, is at best, somewhat nave and at worst, certainly misleading. The truth is that this was wishful thinking and nowadays ‘claims’ are far more realistic. The reality is that whilst they have their successes they also have their limitations – they can’t treat all hair colours and types and all skin colours successfully and they now accept their limitations and embrace electrolysis and electrologists as their back up.
Laser and IPL are allowed by the FDA to claim permanent ‘reduction’ however not permanent ‘removal’ of hair. The reality is this newer technology is brilliant for big areas and for dark hair. For grey or white hair it really simply doesn’t work. Laser and IPL target the melanin in the hair and if the hair is grey or white there’s no melanin remaining in the hair for this to target. In addition to this, for unknown reason(s) not all of the hair reacts to treatment and results vary from 85% – 95% success. The remaining 5% – 15% hair will undoubtedly be stripped of its melanin (thus appearing white) but nevertheless stubbornly continues to grow. This then leaves the only real option of ‘permanent hair removal’ right down to additional electrolysis treatment to complete the job. Laser and IPL are actually recognised to be always a hair ‘management’ system and clients are advised that regrowth may occur.
Photoepilator light energy was launched in 1969 and was developed from research into laser hair removal. Photoepilators make use of a burst of filtered light targeted at one hair at a time. After the focus of the light, the hair is tweezed. Like any laser and light instrument, the light used in the device is targeted against the blood and melanin pigments in the hair and heats them up. Allow this process, fibre-optic probes were inserted to the hair follicle through that your light was flashed. There is no clinical data published to date to aid any permanency claims and there’s no established data on its effectiveness.
The tweezer method with its unsubstantiated claim of ‘permanent hair removal’ was first patented in 1959. This method functions by passing an household current through the tweezers, which holds the hair at first glance of skin by grasping them for all minutes. Electricity enters through the hair to its root and claims to permanently damage it. The scientific community has reservations as the claim of electricity destroying the main of the hair doesn’t have scientific backup.
Transcutaneous and Transdermal offers ‘permanent Hair Removal’ but no clinical data has been published up to now to determine the claim that permanent hair removal is possible using these methods. In 1985 when the usage of AC electric tweezers was stopped, the manufacturers made some modifications in the apparatus. Adhesive patches instead of cotton swabs were introduced and a name change into transcutaneous hair removal. It uses the idea of direct current (DC) for transdermal delivery of drugs (iontophoresis) without the usage of a needle. A DC household current is passed by way of a conductive gel at first glance of skin via an adhesive patch positioned on the skin. The hair root is claimed to be damaged permanently by the household current that travels right down to the hair follicle.
To date no clinical data can be acquired and the laws of physics don’t support the claims created by the manufacturers. Hair doesn’t conduct electricity but skin does. As electricity passes through the medium of poor resistance, it’ll spread along the outer lining of skin as opposed to passing through the hair. Therefore, much like the tweezer method, the argument so it will reach the main of the hair to destroy it doesn’t have scientific backup.
Ultrasound hair removal claims that ultrasound waves are channelled precisely down the hair shaft and in the act they transform to thermal energy that super heats the hair growth areas and inhibits regrowth. It’s stated that the waves are bound to the hair shaft and don’t dissipate into skin prevents any side effects.
Ultrasound hair removal offers ‘total hair removal’ and claims to function as the ‘next generation of long term hair removal devices’ ;.It states in its marketing material that it’s ‘The hair removal solution’ and that ‘no additional hair appears in exactly the same follicle proving that this is a long-term treatment’ ;.The FDA has not given the outcomes up to now regarding a software to promote in April 2010 of the newest device.