You can avoid two calls to the bookmaker and lock in today’s line on a later game by telling your bookmaker you intend to make an “if” bet. “If” bets can be made on two games kicking off at the exact same time. The bookmaker will wait until the first game is over. If the initial game wins, he will put an equal amount on the 2nd game though it was already played.
Although an “if” bet is obviously two straight bets at normal vig, you cannot decide later that you no longer want the 2nd bet. When you make an “if” bet, the 2nd bet can’t be cancelled, even if the 2nd game hasn’t gone off yet. If the initial game wins, you could have action on the 2nd game. For this reason, there is less control over an “if” bet than over two straight bets. แทงมวยวันนี้ When the 2 games you bet overlap in time, however, the only method to bet one only when another wins is by placing an “if” bet. Obviously, when two games overlap in time, cancellation of the 2nd game bet is no issue. It should be noted, that when the 2 games start at different occuring times, most books will not permit you to complete the 2nd game later. You should designate both teams whenever you make the bet.
You can make an “if” bet by saying to the bookmaker, “I do want to make an ‘if’ bet,” and then, “Give me Team A IF Team B for $100.” Giving your bookmaker that instruction will be the just like betting $110 to win $100 on Team A, and then, only when Team A wins, betting another $110 to win $100 on Team B.
If the initial team in the “if” bet loses, there is no bet on the 2nd team. Regardless of whether the 2nd team wins of loses, your total loss on the “if” bet could be $110 whenever you lose on the initial team. If the initial team wins, however, you would have a bet of $110 to win $100 going on the 2nd team. Because case, if the 2nd team loses, your total loss could be just the $10 of vig on the split of the 2 teams. If both games win, you would win $100 on Team A and $100 on Team B, for an overall total win of $200. Thus, the maximum loss on an “if” could be $110, and the maximum win could be $200. That is balanced by the disadvantage of losing the full $110, rather than $10 of vig, each time the teams split with the initial team in the bet losing.
Bettors soon discovered that the way to steer clear of the uncertainty brought on by the order of wins and loses is to produce two “if” bets putting each team first. As opposed to betting $110 on ” Team A if Team B,” you would bet just $55 on ” Team A if Team B.” and then create a second “if” bet reversing the order of the teams for another $55. The next bet would put Team B first and Team A second. This type of double bet, reversing the order of the exact same two teams, is known as an “if/reverse” or sometimes merely a “reverse.”
If both teams win, the result will be the same just like you played just one “if” bet for $100. You win $50 on Team A in the initial “if bet, and then $50 on Team B, for an overall total win of $100. In the 2nd “if” bet, you win $50 on Team B, and then $50 on Team A, for an overall total win of $100. The two “if” bets together result in a total win of $200 when both teams win.
If both teams lose, the result would also be the same as if you played just one “if” bet for $100. Team A’s loss would cost you $55 in the initial “if” combination, and nothing would look at Team B. In the 2nd combination, Team B’s loss would cost you $55 and nothing would look at to Team A. You would lose $55 on each of the bets for an overall total maximum lack of $110 whenever both teams lose.
The difference occurs when the teams split. As opposed to losing $110 when the initial team loses and the 2nd wins, and $10 when the initial team wins but the 2nd loses, in the reverse you will lose $60 on a divided no matter what team wins and which loses. It calculates this way. If Team A loses you will lose $55 on the initial combination, and have nothing going on the winning Team B. In the 2nd combination, you will win $50 on Team B, and have action on Team A for a $55 loss, resulting in a net loss on the 2nd combination of $5 vig. The increased loss of $55 on the initial “if” bet and $5 on the 2nd “if” bet provides you with a combined lack of $60 on the “reverse.” When Team B loses, you will lose the $5 vig on the initial combination and the $55 on the 2nd combination for the exact same $60 on the split..
We’ve accomplished this smaller lack of $60 in place of $110 when the initial team loses without decrease in the win when both teams win. In both the single $110 “if” bet and the 2 reversed “if” bets for $55, the win is $200 when both teams cover the spread. The bookmakers would never put themselves at that sort of disadvantage, however. The gain of $50 whenever Team A loses is fully offset by the extra $50 loss ($60 in place of $10) whenever Team B may be the loser. Thus, the “reverse” doesn’t actually save us hardly any money, but it comes with the benefit of making the chance more predictable, and avoiding the worry concerning which team to place first in the “if” bet.
DON’T, when you can win a lot more than 52.5% or maybe more of one’s games. If you cannot consistently achieve a successful percentage, however, making “if” bets when you bet two teams will save you money.
For the winning bettor, the “if” bet adds an element of luck to your betting equation that doesn’t belong there. If two games are worth betting, then they should both be bet. Betting on one should not be produced dependent on whether or not you win another. On the other hand, for the bettor who has a negative expectation, the “if” bet will prevent him from betting on the 2nd team whenever the initial team loses. By preventing some bets, the “if” bet saves the negative expectation bettor some vig.
The $10 savings for the “if” bettor results from the fact he’s not betting the 2nd game when both lose. Compared to the straight bettor, the “if” bettor comes with an additional cost of $100 when Team A loses and Team B wins, but he saves $110 when Team A and Team B both lose.
The rule for the winning bettor is precisely opposite. Something that keeps the winning bettor from betting more games is bad, and therefore “if” bets will definitely cost the winning handicapper money. Once the winning bettor plays fewer games, he has fewer winners. Understand that next time someone informs you that the way to win is to bet fewer games. A smart winner never wants to bet fewer games. Since “if/reverses” work-out the exact same as “if” bets, they both place the winner at an equal disadvantage.
Exceptions to the Rule – Whenever a Winner Should Bet Parlays and “IF’s”
Just like all rules, there are exceptions. “If” bets and parlays should really be created by a winner with a positive expectation in just two circumstances::
If you find no other choice and she must bet either an “if/reverse,” a parlay, or a teaser; or
When betting co-dependent propositions.
The only real time I will think of that you’ve no other choice is if you’re the very best man at your friend’s wedding, you’re waiting to walk down the aisle, your laptop looked ridiculous in the pocket of one’s tux so you left it in the car, you only bet offshore in a deposit account without credit line, the book has a $50 minimum phone bet, you like two games which overlap in time, you grab your trusty cell 5 minutes before kickoff and 45 seconds before you have to walk to the alter with some beastly bride’s maid in a frilly purple dress on your arm, you try to produce two $55 bets and suddenly realize you only have $75 in your account.
Since the old philosopher used to express, “Is that what’s troubling you, bucky?” In that case, hold your face up high, put a look on that person, look for the silver lining, and create a $50 “if” bet on your two teams. Obviously you could bet a parlay, but as you will see below, the “if/reverse” is a great substitute for the parlay if you’re winner.
For the winner, the very best method is straight betting. In the event of co-dependent bets, however, as already discussed, there is a massive advantage to betting combinations. With a parlay, the bettor is getting the main benefit of increased parlay odds of 13-5 on combined bets which have greater compared to normal expectation of winning. Since, by definition, co-dependent bets must often be contained within the exact same game, they must be produced as “if” bets. With a co-dependent bet our advantage arises from the fact we make the 2nd bet only IF one of the propositions wins.
It would do us no good to straight bet $110 each on the favourite and the underdog and $110 each on the over and the under. We’d simply lose the vig irrespective of how often the favorite and over or the underdog and under combinations won. As we’ve seen, if we play two out of 4 possible results in two parlays of the favourite and over and the underdog and under, we can net a $160 win when certainly one of our combinations comes in. When to find the parlay or the “reverse” when making co-dependent combinations is discussed below.
Choosing Between “IF” Bets and Parlays
Based on a $110 parlay, which we’ll use for the purpose of consistent comparisons, our net parlay win when certainly one of our combinations hits is $176 (the $286 win on the winning parlay minus the $110 loss on the losing parlay). In a $110 “reverse” bet our net win could be $180 each time certainly one of our combinations hits (the $400 win on the winning if/reverse minus the $220 loss on the losing if/reverse).